Scanned page

scanned 5 Nov 2026, 02:17 UTC

Not your site? See what AI can read on yours. Scan your site free

AI Visibility Score Grade F

29.6/ 100

Prose Parity 0
Crawler access 22.5
Structure 4.6
Structured data 2.5
Not earned 70.4

ChatGPT sees 0% of this page

0 of 258 rendered words reach a crawler that does not run JavaScript. 191 never arrive.

See what to fix first Keep this page watched

What an AI crawler gets 0 words

Nothing. The HTML this page serves carries no readable main text, so a crawler that does not run JavaScript receives an empty page.

What your browser renders 258 words

Find your material match.
From soft, cozy fabrics, to sleek, long-lasting leathers—your sofa soulmate is just a click away.
SHOP SOFAS & LOVESEATS
Shop By Room
Living Room
Bedroom
Dining Room & Kitchen
Home Office
Outdoor
Decor
Sweet dreams are made of this.
More matching, less overthinking—these sets make styling refreshingly stress-free.
SHOP BEDROOM
Crowd favorites.
Meet the styles our customers love to live with.
Shop Best sellers
Crowd favorites.
Shop Best sellers
Storage, made stylish.
Give everything a place without compromising your space.
SHOP STORAGE
Storage, made stylish.
SHOP STORA...

Show all 258 words

Find your material match.From soft, cozy fabrics, to sleek, long-lasting leathers—your sofa soulmate is just a click away.SHOP SOFAS & LOVESEATSShop By RoomLiving RoomBedroomDining Room & KitchenHome OfficeOutdoorDecorSweet dreams are made of this.More matching, less overthinking—these sets make styling refreshingly stress-free.SHOP BEDROOMCrowd favorites.Meet the styles our customers love to live with.Shop Best sellersCrowd favorites.Shop Best sellersStorage, made stylish.Give everything a place without compromising your space.SHOP STORAGEStorage, made stylish.SHOP STORAGEGet a free design plan.Complete a short form to get your custom design.Get startedShop Top SellersLenia 2-Drawer Nightstand - Walnut$449Timber 90" Leather Sofa - Charme Tan$1799Portima C Side Table - Walnut$199Cooper 1-Drawer Nightstand - Walnut$299Nosh Dining Chair - Walnut and Hemlock Green$149Ceni 88" Corner Sectional - Hemlock Green$1799Heidi 48" - 67.75" Extendable Round Dining Table - Walnut$699Amoeba Side Table - Walnut$149Lenia King Panel Bed - Walnut$1299Stein Rug Pad 8 x 10$129Heidi 62" - 82.75" Extendable Dining Table - Walnut$899Cooper 6-Drawer Double Dresser - Walnut$999Cooper King Low Profile Bed - Walnut$999Lenia 6-Drawer Double Dresser - Walnut$1299Hendrick 47.25" Dining Table - Smoked OakContract Grade$899Jokuna 48" Vinyl Media Unit - Walnut$999Great style in the wild.Looking for inspo? Check out how our customers have styled their own Article furniture. See more.Photo by @rusticwhiteinteriorsPhoto by @alexander_koch1Photo by @myneutralliving

74% of this page's content never reaches an AI crawler.

191 words of the 258 a browser renders never reach an AI crawler. The chance to get cited by AI is very low to near zero.

Both panels are the main text of the same page, counted the same way and fetched twice at the same moment: once as an AI crawler asks for it, with no JavaScript, and once in a real browser. The panel with more text than fits opens to the full text. Text only one side has is highlighted.

Passages an AI crawler never receives

17 words From soft, cozy fabrics, to sleek, long-lasting leathers—your sofa soulmate is just a click away. about +3.3 on the score
16 words Looking for inspo? Check out how our customers have styled their own Article furniture. See more. about +3.1 on the score
11 words More matching, less overthinking—these sets make styling refreshingly stress-free. about +2.1 on the score
9 words Meet the styles our customers love to live with. about +1.7 on the score
9 words Complete a short form to get your custom design. about +1.7 on the score

22 further passages are highlighted in the browser panel above.

Longest first. A passage counts as missing when its text appears nowhere in the HTML a crawler receives, so a block that merely moved is not listed. Lines under 4 words are not judged either way, because a match on "Get Started" would be chance rather than evidence.

Why a crawler does not get this, and the fix

When an AI crawler visits your page it receives a nearly empty shell, because your words only appear after a browser runs the site's code, which crawlers do not do.

The fix Server-side render or statically generate the page so the main content ships in the initial HTML.

Full impact and the evidence from your page

Where this score comes from

Four weighted parts, and the arithmetic is on the page. Nothing here is rounded in your favour, and anything the scan could not measure says so rather than being folded in as a guess.

AI crawlers see little of what your visitors see.

A critical issue is holding this page back. The grade above does not tell the whole story: start with the critical item below.

Part Weight Measured Points

Prose Parity 50% 0% 0

Crawler access 25% 90% 22.5

Structure 15% 31% 4.6

Structured data 10% 25% 2.5

0 + 22.5 + 4.6 + 2.5 29.6 Read the methodology

Retrievability, measured at 0%, sits beside the score rather than inside it: it checks whether the rendered words can be recovered from the crawler's HTML at all, including from JSON data blocks, and it informs the findings below without adding points.

This page scores higher than 1% of the 1,175 sites we have measured. That puts it in the bottom 10 percent. See the index.

Not indexed; share this link freely. Save it as a PDF with your browser's print (Cmd or Ctrl + P) for a client-ready copy.

This homepage is 50.4 points short of the 80 that unlocks a score badge. Do this first lists the quickest fixes; scan again once they are live.

See if AI recommends you

We ask one AI engine three questions a buyer would ask about your kind of business, and show you whether article.com is named, who is named instead, and the sources it cites. Free, one per email.

We use the email only to send that one link and to keep it to one free check per address.

Your next move

Do this first

8 things are holding this page back. These are the 3 worth doing first, in order.

Critical Main content is invisible to AI crawlers

Server-side render or statically generate the page so the main content ships in the initial HTML.

AI assistants cannot see what you sell or say, so when a buyer asks about your kind of business they get told about competitors whose pages are readable and you are left out entirely.

See the evidence for this csr_blank

up to +50
Major Server-level blocking of AI crawler user agents

Requests with AI crawler user agents get blocked at the edge. Review CDN/WAF bot rules if you want AI visibility.

AI systems are stopped at the door, so none of your content is available for them to summarize or recommend.

See the evidence for this ua_enforcement

+2.5
Major No <title> in the initial HTML

Ship a unique, descriptive title tag server-side.

With no reliable name to attach to the page, AI assistants struggle to identify or cite it, so you can be left out when a buyer asks about what you do.

See the evidence for this missing_title

+2.3

5 more findings below, ranked the same way.

Estimated gain is the sub-score arithmetic applied to this page, not a prediction about citations. Clearing the first item alone would move this page from 29.6 to at most 79.6.

Fixed something? Prove it.

We re-measure this page now and show the before and after side by side, including the parts that did not move. One re-check per report.

See how you stack up: compare article.com against a competitor.

What to know about this measurement 2 notes on what was and was not measured

A cookie consent overlay (CybotCookiebotDialog) was still present at extraction; some rendered text may sit behind it.
server-level blocking observed for GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User, PerplexityBot, Perplexity-User, Meta-ExternalAgent, Bytespider: -0.10 (confidence-scaled)

The rendered page How this page looked in a real browser at scan time

Rendered screenshot of article.com — How the page looked in a real browser at scan time. The measurements come from the extracted text above, not from this image.

Bot access matrix 10 of 15 AI crawlers worth a look, none blocked in a way that costs you

Every AI crawler we track, and what your site does when it asks for this page. Turning a model training crawler away is a choice, not a fault, so those are marked apart from the blocks that cost you score.

10 worth a look
5 can reach this page

Nothing is fully blocked. 10 rows need a second look before you call this clean.

15 / 15 named crawler tokens allowed in robots.txt
2 / 12 live probes got the page (HTTP 2xx)
3 rule-only or not probed, so no server response to read

Reaching a page is not the same as reading it. The crawlers marked allowed here are let in and receive the same HTML a browser gets, but on this page that HTML is a near-empty shell until JavaScript runs. What they can actually read is scored separately: see Main content is invisible to AI crawlers below.

Bot access matrix: the AI crawlers your robots.txt or your server treats differently.
Crawler	Purpose	Status	robots.txt	Server response
`GPTBot` OpenAI	Purpose Training	Server may be blocking this	robots.txtallowed Allow: /	Server responseblocked at the server (HTTP 403)
`OAI-SearchBot` OpenAI	Purpose AI search	Server may be blocking this	robots.txtallowed Allow: /	Server responseblocked at the server (HTTP 403)
`ChatGPT-User` OpenAI	Purpose Assistant	Server may be blocking this	robots.txtallowed Allow: /	Server responseblocked at the server (HTTP 403)
`ClaudeBot` Anthropic	Purpose Training	Server may be blocking this	robots.txtallowed Allow: /	Server responseblocked at the server (HTTP 403)
`Claude-SearchBot` Anthropic	Purpose AI search	Server may be blocking this	robots.txtallowed Allow: /	Server responseblocked at the server (HTTP 403)
`Claude-User` Anthropic	Purpose Assistant	Server may be blocking this	robots.txtallowed Allow: /	Server responseblocked at the server (HTTP 403)
`PerplexityBot` Perplexity	Purpose AI search	Server may be blocking this	robots.txtallowed Allow: /	Server responseblocked at the server (HTTP 403)
`Perplexity-User` Perplexity	Purpose Assistant	Server may be blocking this	robots.txtallowed Allow: /	Server responseblocked at the server (HTTP 403)
`Meta-ExternalAgent` Meta	Purpose Training	Server may be blocking this	robots.txtallowed Allow: /	Server responseblocked at the server (HTTP 403)
`Bytespider` ByteDance	Purpose Training	Server may be blocking this	robots.txtallowed Allow: /	Server responseblocked at the server (HTTP 403)

5 other crawlers reach this page normally. Show them

The AI crawlers that reach this page normally.
Crawler	Purpose	Status	robots.txt	Server response
`anthropic-ai` Anthropic	Purpose Training	Allowed	robots.txtallowed Allow: /	Server responseno request user agent exists to test
`Google-Extended` Google	Purpose Training	Allowed	robots.txtallowed Allow: /	Server responseno request user agent exists to test
`Applebot-Extended` Apple	Purpose Training	Allowed	robots.txtallowed Allow: /	Server responseno request user agent exists to test
`CCBot` Common Crawl	Purpose Training	Reaches your page	robots.txtallowed Allow: /	Server responsesame page served (HTTP 202)
`Amazonbot` Amazon	Purpose Training	Reaches your page	robots.txtallowed Allow: /	Server responsesame page served (HTTP 202)

Server may be blocking this
Your robots.txt welcomes this crawler, but your server answered its user agent with a block. Nothing in your rules asked for that, so this is more likely blanket bot defense reacting to our test request than a rule aimed at this crawler, and the scan records it at low confidence. Servers that verify crawler IPs will block a spoofed user agent from any scanner; the real crawler may pass.
Allowed
Your robots.txt allows this token. It is a robots.txt token only: it sends no user agent of its own, so there is no server response to test and none is implied.
Reaches your page
Your robots.txt allows this crawler and your server returned it the same page it returns to a browser. This measures access, not content: whether that HTML is readable without JavaScript is a separate check, scored as retrievability when the page can be graded.

AI-readiness checklist 2 of 7 basics in place

The page basics an assistant needs, checked against what an AI crawler receives rather than the rendered page. These feed the Structure part of the score above.

Title tag No title tag. It is the first thing an assistant names your page by; add one. Needs work
Meta description No meta description. It is the summary an assistant may quote; add one under 155 characters. Needs work
One H1 heading Not exactly one H1. A crawler reads the page subject from its single H1; use one. Needs work
Canonical URL No canonical link. It tells a crawler which URL is the real one; add rel=canonical. Needs work
Heading coverage Headings cover the content, so a crawler can index it by section. Pass
No wall of text No single block is too long to parse cleanly. Pass
llms.txt No llms.txt. It is informational only, a nice-to-have rather than a ranking factor. Needs work
Structured data Found Organization, but only after JavaScript ran, which a crawler may not see. Pass

Minor

Page does not have exactly one H1

h1_count +2.3

AI crawlers can misread the page's main subject, weakening how confidently they match it to the questions buyers actually ask.

What this means for you

Your page is missing a single clear main heading that says what it is about, or it has several competing ones.

The fix, technically

Use a single H1 stating what the page is about.

Evidence from your pageFound 0 H1 elements in the initial HTML.

Minor

No canonical URL in the initial HTML

missing_canonical +2.3

When the same content sits at more than one address, AI assistants may credit a duplicate instead of your real page, splitting or losing the visibility you have earned.

What this means for you

Your page does not tell AI crawlers which web address is the official one for this content.

The fix, technically

Add an absolute self-referencing canonical link.

Evidence from your pageNo canonical link in the initial HTML.

Minor

No llms.txt

no_llms_txt +1.2

A handful of assistants will read this file if it exists, so adding it gives you a small extra chance of being understood correctly at no cost, though most tools ignore it today.

What this means for you

Your site does not include the optional plain-text guide that some AI assistants look for to understand what your business is about.

The fix, technically

Informational only. Independent 2026 data (Ahrefs, SE Ranking, Google documentation) shows no measurable citation effect from llms.txt. It is checked because it costs nothing and some assistants read it, but it moves neither crawling nor ranking.

Evidence from your pageNo llms.txt at the site root.

Two ways to fix what this found

You are not guessing at this. Across 1,175 sites in our live AI Visibility Index, the average score is 74/100. This report shows exactly where article.com stands.

Do it yourself

Get your whole site audited with a reviewed, ranked fix plan you can hand to your dev, plus 3 months of monitoring. Delivered in 3 business days.

Tell us you want this

We are finishing this service. Say the word and you go first when it opens.

Just want to keep an eye on this page? Starter, $59/mo.

Have us do it

We implement every fix above and re-scan to prove the gain. We scope it on a short call first, so we only take work we can deliver.

Work with us to fix this

See six real sites measured this way

Crawler-view structured data

Entity confidence

We parsed the JSON-LD in the HTML a no-JavaScript crawler receives and checked five properties of the identity it declares. This measures your markup, not any AI system's behavior: nobody outside those systems can observe what they do with a given property, so nothing here is a prediction. Scored separately from your 29.6/100 score.

0/100 Not declared No identity node in the HTML a crawler receives. 0 of 5 signals present

Missing: Identity declaredAn identity node exists in the rendered DOM but not in the HTML a crawler receives, so a crawler that does not run JavaScript gets nothing here. Emit the same JSON-LD in the initial HTML.
Missing: External identifiers (sameAs)Measured on the identity node, and no identity node was found. Declare one first, then add sameAs URLs to it.
Missing: Stable identifier (@id)Measured on the identity node, and no identity node was found. Declare one first, then give it an absolute @id.
Missing: Logo declaredMeasured on the identity node, and no identity node was found. Declare one first, then add logo as a full https URL.
Missing: Category declaredMeasured on the identity node, and no identity node was found. Declare one first, then state a category as a specific type, a standard industry code, or a resolvable additionalType URL.

Starting point for your identity block

Built from this scan: the URL we resolved, plus one property for each signal above that we did not find. Every REPLACE_ value is a placeholder, so edit them before you ship this. We do not guess names, logos, profile links or categories, so nothing here is invented. Your identity node exists in the rendered DOM but not in the HTML a crawler receives, so this belongs in the initial HTML your server sends, not in a script that writes it later.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "@id": "https://article.com/#organization",
  "name": "REPLACE_WITH_YOUR_ORGANIZATION_NAME",
  "url": "https://article.com/",
  "logo": "REPLACE_WITH_AN_ABSOLUTE_HTTPS_URL_TO_YOUR_LOGO",
  "sameAs": [
    "REPLACE_WITH_A_URL_THAT_IDENTIFIES_THE_SAME_ENTITY"
  ],
  "additionalType": "REPLACE_WITH_A_CATEGORY_URL_OR_DELETE_THIS_LINE"
}
</script>

What each signal measures, the weights, and the sample behind them: the methodology page.

llms.txt This site serves none

This site serves no llms.txt. Informational only. Independent 2026 data (Ahrefs, SE Ranking, Google documentation) shows no measurable citation effect from llms.txt. It is checked because it costs nothing and some assistants read it, but it moves neither crawling nor ranking.

Keywords and prompts

Derive the questions people ask AI assistants where this page could be the answer, scored by how much of each the page actually covers, then test whether a named model brings the brand up at all. The scan you are reading is free and anonymous; this check asks a real model live, so it asks for an email.

Not measured on this run

What a paid plan adds for this page

These four tools run on article.com on any paid plan. They are listed as capabilities, not as a preview: none of it has been measured for this report, so nothing is shown. Everything above stays free.

Locked
Prompt tracking over time

Your prompt set re-run every week with the history kept, the competitors models name instead, and 10 prompts per run.
Locked
Score history

Every past score for this page in one dated chart, linked back to the report behind each point.
Locked
Whole-site audit

Every page on article.com checked and ranked worst first, with a CSV.
Locked
API and MCP

Run this same check from your own code, or from Claude and ChatGPT.

Starter is $59/mo and watches 1,000 pages across 10 sites. Nothing on this report is withheld to sell it. See what a plan adds

Keep article.com readable to AI

This report is a snapshot. Parity regressions are silent, because nothing looks wrong in a browser, so the way they get caught is a re-check after every deploy rather than a person remembering to look.

Free: get told if it slips

AI visibility drops silently after a redeploy or a CDN tweak. Get one email if article.com drops, plus a weekly summary either way. No spam.

Free tier watches 25 pages across 3 sites, re-checked weekly, with a drift alert when a page drops more than 6 points.

Starter · $59/mo

Or find out before your customers do

We tell you what broke, and what it cost you. Not just that a number moved: the words that stopped reaching crawlers, the crawler that lost access, and the likely reason.
Every week, on this page and up to 1,000 more, with the history to show when it happened
See the AI prompts this page could answer, and the keyword angles you are missing
Audit your whole site: every page checked, worst first, with a CSV
Your API + MCP key for code, Claude, and ChatGPT

See plans and pricing

Keep this report

The link is the report; nothing is gated behind this. If you want it in your inbox to forward or find again, we will send it.

ChatGPT sees 0% of this page

Passages an AI crawler never receives

Why a crawler does not get this, and the fix

Where this score comes from

See if AI recommends you

Do this first

What to know about this measurement 2 notes on what was and was not measured

The rendered page How this page looked in a real browser at scan time

Bot access matrix 10 of 15 AI crawlers worth a look, none blocked in a way that costs you

AI-readiness checklist 2 of 7 basics in place

What is holding you back, worst first

Main content is invisible to AI crawlers

Server-level blocking of AI crawler user agents

No <title> in the initial HTML

Structured data is injected client-side only

No meta description in the initial HTML

Page does not have exactly one H1

No canonical URL in the initial HTML

No llms.txt

Two ways to fix what this found

Do it yourself

Have us do it

Entity confidence

Starting point for your identity block

llms.txt This site serves none

Keywords and prompts

What a paid plan adds for this page

Prompt tracking over time

Score history

Whole-site audit

API and MCP

Keep article.com readable to AI

Free: get told if it slips

Or find out before your customers do

Keep this report